It seems to me the main objective here was to get the WTS (and other religious institutions) to do more to protect kids from this sort of abuse. Even the Boy Scouts and Penn State are facing similar issues. You can't convict a corporation of this sort of crime, but you can punish their lack of reasonable action via the civil system.
Bottom line, entities that are given trust such as religious entities, youth organizations and schools must do everything in their power to protect kids. The WTS has shown that they care more about their reputation than they do about their children.
Even if this verdict is overturned on appeal (which would mean there was some sort of technical error made by the trial judge) I think the jury sent a loud and clear message to all these organizations that this type of behavior is not tolerated. They must do everything in their power to protect children and warn parents in their congregations and people in the community about the abuser. This individual was going door to door under the direction of elders who are directly appointed by the WTS.